What Is a Hybrid Publishing Contract

Hybrid publishing combines elements from two different sources. Hybrid publishing takes the best features of traditional editing and self-publishing, but also fixes the shortcomings of these two models. How? Let`s look at what happens in typical traditional and hybrid publishing scenarios and what that means for the author. Ultimately, the author will pay a significant portion of the publisher`s bill. And in return, they have to trust the hybrid press to do what`s best for their book. Unless everything goes according to plan, the author has very little recourse to recover his investment. I`m not surprised that agents don`t see (or don`t want to see) hybrids. Agents earn money with a percentage of advances and royalties. Hybrids do not pay upfront. An agent does not want to introduce a publisher who does not pay in advance. JOHN: When do you think an author should consider a hybrid publishing option, as opposed to pure self-publishing or purchasing a full-service publishing package from a reputable provider? Like self-publishing, hybrid publishing allows authors to receive a much larger share of royalties for each copy of a book they sell. To put things in perspective, a typical book contract with a traditional publisher earns authors 10-15% royalties for a hardcover, 8-10% for a paperback and 25% for an e-book. Hybrid publishing, on the other hand, can allow the author to collect up to 50% royalties.

Have you worked with a hybrid editor? Or do you have any questions? Share your thoughts in the comments below. All this should be clear in the contract, although this does not mean that the contract does not favor the publisher over the author. If you are not represented by an agent, you should always review and negotiate your publishing contract before signing it or hire a professional with experience in negotiating publishing contracts for you. The second most common option is self-publishing, where you pay money for the services in order to get you a nice cover, editorial services, formatting services, etc. that will take your book to a professional level before you can sell your book. This gives you control, but can be expensive not only with your money, but also with your time. But today`s hybrid publishers aren`t interested in vain authors. They are looking for authors who want to have more control over their own books and are willing to pay for this privilege in advance. And for some writers — especially those with extensive online platforms and oral careers — it`s a bargain.

It`s like hiring a contractor. You pay the contractor to oversee the design, construction, plumbing, electrical, etc. because they have the contacts and expertise that you lack or don`t have the bandwidth for. When it is finished, own the house; The contractor did it (for a fee), but he doesn`t own it. Hybrid publishing is quickly becoming the new normal. It`s just as good, if not better, than traditional publishing. Don`t hit on the spot because you`re “suspicious.” If you`ve determined that you`re dealing with a reputable company, the next thing you should consider is whether a hybrid editor is actually the best option. BROOKE: Authors should think about their publication goals. I see three main reasons why an author should consider a hybrid editor: I see it far too often: an author was picked up by a vanity press when he thought he was working with a hybrid editor.

I understand how easy it can be for a writer to convince themselves that they are making the right choice by going with the publisher who seems to promise so much. Some authors have raised funds creatively – and it`s important to know this because it debunks the myth that you have to have a large amount of disposable income to go in the hybrid direction. One person financed her first book and paid for the second with the royalties she earned. Another found a relative who was willing to draw her first book, and then reinvested the royalties to earn enough to fund a second book at a much lower cost, as she had learned enough to do a lot of tasks herself. Today, we`re going to explore one of the latest of these publishing models: hybrid publishing. With hybrid publishing, the author pays the publisher a royalty in advance to offset production costs. While this is often abused by exploiting companies, there are reputable hybrid publishers that offer solid value to the author`s investment. We invited Brooke Warner to discuss the pros and cons of this growing model. The main advantage of the hybrid model seems to be for those who choose it control – over timing, rights, the result and the product itself.

The main obstacle for those who do not choose it seems to be money. For some, there may be a second edition – the dream of being traditionally published by a great publisher, and the fear that you won`t be a “real author” if a fairy publisher/godmother doesn`t hit you with their magic wand. With self-publishing, I can make my book available on Amazon as an eBook, paperback, and audiobook. It wouldn`t cost me anything – or no more than what I`ve already spent on a publisher and artist on the cover. Amazon pays 70% of the royalties, which is a deal that no publisher can improve. I would actually lose about 35% of the royalties if I opted for a hybrid. And I should pay for that privilege. That`s what hybrid publishing is all about: giving you the chance of a lifetime. JOHN: From ALLi`s point of view, the cardinal rule of publishing is that the money goes to the author. Unfortunately, this advice has been distorted into “never pay for publication”, which is a gross simplification. Professional freelance writers regularly pay for self-publishing services, and there`s nothing wrong with that by nature.

It is the quality of the work and the return on investment that authors must pay attention to. An author writes the book, pays part or all of the cost of producing the book, and participates in marketing activities. Like a traditional publisher, the hybrid publisher produces the book professionally, distributes it to multiple outlets, and performs marketing activities on behalf of the book. However, this type of market leads to more money for the author after publication. [4] – The European Commission is advocating for fairer author contracts after a new study showed an average income of £12,500 – The Society of Authors – www.societyofauthors.org/News/News/2016/October-2016/New-EC-study Although this is an emerging concept, this idea has been around for some time and is used by some traditional publishers who have decided in the past to choose a low-risk option and a contributory contract. As the name suggests, a hybrid editor combines elements of traditional publishing and self-publishing. In most cases, they operate like a traditional publisher, with the main exception that their authors subsidize the cost of publishing and do not receive an advance on royalties. More similar to the traditional edition, this is probably what comes to mind when you think of the “hybrid edition”. Hybrid presses that follow a partnership model buy manuscripts they believe in and guide them every step of the way, from publishing to marketing, just like any Big 5 or independent press. There are two key differences from traditional publishing.

First of all, the author bears a large part of the costs of producing his book. Then they don`t get an advance and instead earn a larger share of the royalties – more about that later! Paying money in advance does not mean that the company is a subsidized publisher. Check out their website and social media and be sure to judge them yourself instead of being confused by a blogger with a misconception about the publishing industry. I have a children`s book is a hybrid editor that suits me better or should I look for an agent to learn more about vanity publishing (and how to distinguish it from reputable hybrids), read this article on scam prevention in the publishing world. Today, Dudley Court Press is a contemporary hybrid publisher focused on publishing meaningful books by authors who have extensive personal experience or professional expertise in the field of their book. BROOKE: Yes, I totally agree. For this reason, the IBPA`s hybrid publisher criteria stipulate that reputable hybrid presses pay their authors a higher license fee than the standard. The criterion states that the author`s share of the profits is presented in a transparent manner and must be proportional to the author`s investment.

The IBPA also states that the author`s royalties for print and digital books should be more than 50% of the net. For my two footprints, we opted for royalties of more than 50% because the authors` investments are high. I encourage the authors to also understand where the other percentage goes. In our case, our distributor takes a commission of 30-35% on the sale, so we return almost all the profits to the authors. This is intentional, and for us it does not mean a lack of investment in the success of the books, but rather a desire to reward the author as much as possible, so that there is a greater incentive to the financial risk he naturally takes when he publishes with us. Once an author`s work has been accepted, most hybrids offer a selection of packages that cover services ranging from the basic (design, production, and distribution) to enhanced services (e.B development publishing, marketing materials, or media relations). Others take a strict a la carte approach, either by recommending a tailor-made plan or by allowing the author to develop their own plan. .